Training and racing the Tour definitely takes a toll, but it also seems to (mostly) pay off in the long run
The Tour de France is nearly inarguably the hardest endurance event on the planet. Exercise scientists have calculated their TRIMP (“training impulse,” training volume x training intensity; a metric like Strava’s suffer score) value for the 21-day beat down at an astronomical 7,112. For reference, the TRIMP for running a marathon is about 300. During the race the riders become increasingly catabolic, eating into their own muscle tissue faster than they replace it. They also become pseudo-anemic as they rip through red blood cells, and their immunity plummets as their free radical damage rises.
So, yeah, nobody would call the Tour itself particularly healthy. But all those weeks when they’re not straddling the razor thin wire between lighting it up and going down in flames? The pro pedallers seem to reap some lasting rewards… though some risks remain. Here’s how they stack up against typical folks who have to ride their office chairs more than their bicycles for three weeks in July.
No surprise here, Tour riders (though some appear lacking in upper body muscle) have healthier than average body compositions across the board. Climbers, of course, tend to be whippet thin at an average height of 5’8” to 5’10” and an average weight of just 132 to 145 pounds (BMI of 19 to 20). Time trial specialists, while still very lean, are bigger and heavier, averaging 5’10 to 6’ in height and 154 to 165 pounds (BMI ~22) in weight. Podium contenders are a little lighter, but closer to TT builds. By contrast, the average American man is currently 5’9” and 195.5 pounds and the average woman is currently 5’4” and 166.2 pounds, both of which come in at BMIs over 26 (the healthy range, though there is debate regarding BMI, is 18.5 to 24.9).
Despite some fears that too much exhausting exercise (like grinding over Alpine summit after summit after summit) might take years off one’s life, research finds that Tour riders go on to outlive the rest of us. One study that compared the death rates of more than 830 Tour riders from France, Italy, and Belgium with those in the general population found that the cyclists lived an average of 17% longer (living till 81.5 vs. 73.5).
This one could be a chink in the armor, quite literally. Competitive cyclists are at risk for low bone density if that’s all they do, because cycling is a non-weight bearing sport. University of Oklahoma researchers who scanned the skeletons of 32 competitive male road cyclists aged 18 to 45 found that nearly all of them had lower bone density than their same-age peers who weren’t competitive cyclists. Some even had osteopenia, a precursor to osteoporosis. That tide may turn, however, as the younger generation of professional cyclists routinely perform more bone-building strength and power training and new research reveals that today’s 19 year olds are as sedentary as 60 year olds.
"Much, but certainly not all, of the increased longevity among Tour cyclists is thought to be due to better cardiovascular health," says Larry Creswell, MD, author of The Haywire Heart. "Perhaps that's no surprise. But there may indeed be some cardiac risk that comes with long-time cycling. Although rare, there are examples of professional riders with cardiac arrest, or 'heart attack,' either during training or competition, and this often occurs in relatively young riders. We also know that long-time endurance athletes of all sorts, cyclists included, have higher than expected rates of atrial fibrillation. While atrial fibrillation is generally considered to be a 'benign' arrhythmia, this condition can be associated with other important problems such as stroke. Tour cyclists are an amazing breed and we could learn more from careful study of their heart health over their lifetimes."